Can You Entrust Your Services Partner With Your Demand Reduction Goals?
In two of my previous posts, I briefly described two maturity models for technical support domain: “Operational Maturity Model” and “Engagement Maturity Model.” This time around I will talk about how these maturity models are inter-connected and how the progress on operational maturity ladder depends on advancement along engagement maturity levels.
When a support organization is at ‘Reactive Support’ level of operational maturity, it can adopt ‘staff-augmentation’ mode of engagement with the partner. Outsourced services partner does not own any project management responsibility beyond providing skilled engineers. Product companies want absolute control over the support engineers under contract, as they need them to keep up with the dynamic changes. To this extent, it needs to bear higher cost of project management.
Once the support organization moves to “Organized Operations” with processes optimized and streamlined, it will be able to engage the partner in a much efficient manner. A specific chunk of support activity can easily be identified and transferred to the partner. Partner would also be able to transition delivery ownership to the new team much more smoothly as processes, workflow and interfaces are clearly defined. Apart from independently owning a piece of action, partner will also begin to shoulder significant amount of delivery management. Since the KPIs, SLAs are thoroughly discussed and mutually agreed upon, reviewing the partner’s performance becomes a lot easier. As you can already see, a product company whose support organization attains higher level of process maturity will be able to engage its partner in a more meaningful way, enabling the partner to add more value.
But, it gets tricky when you go further to “Demand Reduction” level. Product company’s goal would be to proactively reduce the incoming support request volume. Now, it is easy to see that this goal directly conflicts with the support partner’s business interests, as the partner thrives on increasing call volume. In such situations, can you depend on a partner to support your demand reduction initiatives? Well, if the partner is a tactical operator, then you can count on them to sabotage your scheme of things. However, a partner who thinks strategically will see a win-win in this situation. After all, end customer satisfaction will increase as support demand reduces. If the partner is able to add higher value (through knowledge management etc.) by reducing demand, they can arguably earn a premium on their services. In true ‘Support Partnership’, they earn your loyalty and lock in future business as well. If you are introducing a new product line, you will definitely think of this partner for supporting it.
So, look for a partner who can work with you in any engagement model and can help you scale up the operational maturity ladder and grow with you.
Related Posts
Can you really provide Technical Support through Social Media? Why do so Many KM Initiatives Fail in Technical Support (TS) Operations? Engagement Maturity Model: How Do I Manage Relationship With My Partner? First Step of Transformation: Know the Maturity Level You Are At Debunking the SMB Myth about Technical Support
Recent Posts
Is vmUnify just a provisioning solution? Distributed Agile and Work-Life Balance Customization in SaaS – Who draws the line? Smart Grid Applications go on Cloud What is the purpose of testing? View all
Most Viewed
Different Views on Consulting (1522) What is Consulting? (1333) B2B Digital Marketing (1264) A fresh look at metrics and the marketing funnel (1105) Can You Entrust Your Services Partner With Your Demand Reduction Goals? (694) View all
Most Commented
What is the difference between Marketing and Sales? (24) An inbuilt mechanism for innovation: organic & ecological (16) Everything That’s Marketing (16) Mumbai Dabbawalas (13) Corporate Blogging: It’s All About Engagement (13) View all
Vlog
Creating Sanity Amidst Test Methodology Madness – Webinar Series Transforming Test Organisation MindTree Vlogs: Role of Independent Testing in the Manufacturing industry A Look Back and A Look Ahead Some Brands Never Get Old View all
Cartlog
What’s in it for me? (WIIFM) When you are an expert on something, where do you learn from? Mantras for Communities FAA-some Avoiding the Death March of IT Delivery View all





Srinivasa Rao
Subroto Bagchi



Bhagat says:
Hi Sir,
This is pertaining to last phase of operational maturity model that leaps into “Value added support”. I could recollect from my previous company where Microsoft has considered us as Strategic partner.
We achieve strategic partner space only by exceeding the expectation of customer satisfaction and consistently meeting and over-performing on SLA front.
By and large Strategic partner is to curb the unwanted cost and more inclined towards implementing innovative ideas that will help Microsoft to control cost significantly.
In one way it’s hits our business by hampering our profit margin, however, business relationship remains eternal out of trust and also weeds out other competitors as all these measures will resort to consolidating business with “ONE” trusted vendor which in turn gets us more businesses.
Does “Value added support” & “Strategic partner” relates to each other?
Need your inputs!
Regards,
Bhagat M