Leadership Lessons from 2008 – About Networking, The Prophet and Planning
Those with a sense of inclusion usually also find it easy to network. And that’s my second learning from 2008 – the power of networking. Success comes to those who are well networked, those who can influence others, those willing to negotiate. What is networking? Networking is the nurturing of a rich set of relationships that one can tap on for diverse causes. Networking can be critical to success, particularly in a crisis, but the investment for this should have been made earlier. I have personally seen how much success depends on my ability to network. In the larger national context, too, networking comes under the name of diplomacy.
When I joined the computer industry more than 20 years back, it was not the most common thing to do. Only those who were bitten by the computing bug were attracted to this profession, so motivation was not an issue. Today, this industry is very attractive as a large job provider, so everyone wants to study computer science, information science, EC, EE, EEE. MCA, …. I have not been convinced this is the best thing to do. I believe one must do what they want to do, what they’d enjoy doing. When our interest and our work are the same, it’s a happy coincidence and we are bound to do well. Industries have their cycles, and if we persevere at what we are good at, we will survive the cycles and meet success. Such thoughts led me to organize a panel discussion for students (and their parents) who had qualified in the premier engineering entrance examinations earlier this year. The panel had computer designers, an architect, and academicians from science and engineering. Parents questioned us – if not software, then what? I realized this was a genuine question – in reality, we are not so well informed on the diverse opportunities that exist for our children today. I know we cannot attribute this to just one discussion, but we do have a significant number of bright students from Bangalore opting for physics this year. I believe we need to do a lot more of this, and not just for the filtered set as we did this time.
I have been thinking about and looking for that silver bullet that will transform the leadership team at MindTree, and during this year, I seemed to have hit upon the target. It is a lovely concept that focuses not on building this skill or that, but on influencing your being, by helping you dive into who you are. Such programs usually find it difficult to be accepted in a corporate environment, so I was careful. There was plenty of plotting and planning, and I introduced five influential leaders to a two-day snapshot of this program. They were thrilled, and I was excited I was making progress! I distributed books on this concept, and that was a hit, too. Next came what I thought was the clinching move. We had the author of this concept (and the leader of this organization) come over and talk to our leadership team. His talk was a disaster! He didn’t get the pulse of the audience, just failed to connect.
I was back to the drawing board. I found two lessons here; sometimes, the prophet may be more effective than God. In this case, the messenger of God impressed us every time he interacted with us, and I am confident he would have connected well with our leadership team; but God did not. My second lesson is as important – probably, I planned too much and worried too much about what will pan out. I should have just followed my heart and gone ahead, without all the elaborate planning.
Related Posts
Leadership Lessons from Sunil Gavaskar Learn to Think – Part 2 Leadership Lessons from 2008 – Go and Market directly to Your Target Audience Leadership Lessons from 2008 – Power of Inclusion
Recent Posts
Is vmUnify just a provisioning solution? Distributed Agile and Work-Life Balance Customization in SaaS – Who draws the line? Smart Grid Applications go on Cloud What is the purpose of testing? View all
Most Viewed
Different Views on Consulting (1522) What is Consulting? (1333) B2B Digital Marketing (1264) A fresh look at metrics and the marketing funnel (1105) Can You Entrust Your Services Partner With Your Demand Reduction Goals? (694) View all
Most Commented
What is the difference between Marketing and Sales? (24) An inbuilt mechanism for innovation: organic & ecological (16) Everything That’s Marketing (16) Mumbai Dabbawalas (13) Corporate Blogging: It’s All About Engagement (13) View all
Vlog
Creating Sanity Amidst Test Methodology Madness – Webinar Series Transforming Test Organisation MindTree Vlogs: Role of Independent Testing in the Manufacturing industry A Look Back and A Look Ahead Some Brands Never Get Old View all
Cartlog
What’s in it for me? (WIIFM) When you are an expert on something, where do you learn from? Mantras for Communities FAA-some Avoiding the Death March of IT Delivery View all





Kalyan Kumar Banerjee
Subroto Bagchi



Girish M says:
This is an excellent blog post. I particularly liked the statement “sometimes, the prophet may be more effective than God”. Many people think communication is more important than the message itself (“Its not what you say, but how you say”), which is seems misguided. Lack of effective communication skills by a thinker is not a limitation. One person cannot have all the skills – but different people with complementary skills need to work together to create a chain of success – both God and the Prophet each played an important and unique role here.
Ravi sankar says:
Hi kalyan
I couldn’t understand much. You mean to say people who don’t network/connected much can’t influence.
Can you tell me more about the following statement “influencing your being, by helping you dive into who you are”
Kalyan K. Banerjee says:
Dear Ravi,
Such programs can be broadly called ‘self leadership’. The essential concept runs thus:
When we complain about the world, we usually expect the world to change. But that does not happen. What is more practical is to look inside ourselves and see how our relationship with the world can change.
For example, we may conclude someone is insensitive or uncooperative or unethical, and feel bitter about it. Instead we have the option to look into ourselves and see what we can do about it. To begin with, we can ask: why are we complaining? Is it because we have lost out on something? We need to make honest response to such queries if we have to find a solution. Finally, we may choose one of many ways to deal with that person:
1. ignore him
2. forgive him
3. try and interact more with him so as to understand him
4. have no-agenda interactions with him, so I can get to see his perspective.
5. see why we do not agree on issues, and how I can change my perspective, or be open to his perspective
6. share my discomfort with him, openly
or a combination of above.
This approach is powerful as we are retaining the onus of change. So we are the actor rather than observer. Even if we do not act, we do not complain any more as we know we have chosen not to act.
When I say dive into who you are, I mean you get to know more about yourself through a process of self inquiry.
Ravi sankar says:
Thanks kalyan for the clarification.